According to Paulo de Matos Junior, an entrepreneur in the financial sector, the use of cryptoassets as a payment instrument in corporate transactions represents an area of innovation that has gained increasing relevance as companies seek faster and more cost-effective alternatives for certain types of transactions, particularly those involving international transfers of value with multiple banking intermediaries and settlement periods that may extend over several business days. Paulo de Matos Junior, a financial sector entrepreneur with experience in both the foreign exchange and cryptoasset brokerage markets since 2017, has followed this evolution, recognizing that the consolidation of the regulatory framework for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) creates a more favorable environment for companies to adopt these instruments within a robust compliance structure.
Interested in learning more? Read on below!
Which corporate payment use cases make the most sense for cryptoassets?
International payments to suppliers or service providers in countries with limited access to the conventional banking system represent one of the most practical use cases. Small and medium-sized remittances to countries with unfavorable exchange rates in traditional markets constitute another relevant segment, where conversion through U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins may offer more advantageous conditions. Paulo de Matos Junior emphasizes that the feasibility of each use case should take into account not only the potential for cost reduction but also the specific regulatory and tax implications of each type of transaction, since the legal treatment of cryptoasset payments still contains areas of uncertainty across different jurisdictions.
Internal settlements between companies within the same corporate group operating across multiple countries represent another scenario of interest, particularly when available banking channels impose high costs or operational restrictions on large intercompany transfers. In this context, the use of U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins for such transactions reduces exposure to the price volatility associated with cryptoassets that have fluctuating market values, creating a transfer instrument with characteristics more similar to a digital reserve currency than to a speculative asset.
What regulatory considerations are necessary for corporate payments with cryptoassets?
The use of cryptoassets in corporate payments in Brazil must be assessed in light of the foreign exchange regulations issued by the Central Bank of Brazil, which govern foreign currency transactions and may apply to certain international transactions involving digital assets, depending on their structure and purpose. Recording and documenting transactions with the relevant authorities are obligations that companies must verify for each specific type of transaction before execution. In this regard, Paulo de Matos Junior notes that specialized legal advice in foreign exchange and tax law represents a necessary investment for companies intending to incorporate cryptoassets into their payment processes on a compliant basis, as the interpretation of the rules applicable to these transactions has not yet been fully consolidated in Brazilian administrative and judicial practice.
The accounting treatment of cryptoassets used in corporate payments also requires particular attention, since fluctuations in the value of these assets between the time of acquisition and their use may generate gains or losses with tax implications that must be calculated and reported in accordance with applicable regulations. The choice between using stablecoins, which minimize exposure to price fluctuations during the holding period, or cryptoassets with floating values directly affects the complexity of the tax assessment for completed transactions.
How should companies choose the right platform for corporate cryptoasset payments?
Based on these considerations, giving preference to platforms authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil is a primary criterion for companies seeking to incorporate cryptoassets into their payment processes within the formal regulatory framework. The use of unauthorized service providers exposes businesses to additional regulatory risks that may outweigh the operational benefits they seek. The suitability of the platform for the intended transaction volume and corporate profile is also an important factor, as some platforms are primarily designed for individual investors and may not provide the reporting capabilities, accounting integrations, and dedicated support required for regular corporate operations.
Paulo de Matos Junior believes that negotiating specific terms with service providers—including discounted fees for corporate transaction volumes and access to dedicated support channels—is common practice for companies with frequent and large-scale payment needs. Integration between the cryptoasset platform and the company’s financial management systems, including ERP and treasury solutions, largely determines the true operational cost of incorporating these instruments into payment processes, since workflows requiring extensive manual reconciliation may offset much of the expected efficiency gains.
Furthermore, the availability of robust APIs and comprehensive technical documentation from the selected platform represents a significant advantage for companies intending to automate part of their payment workflows rather than relying on manual processes. Conducting pilot projects with a limited transaction volume before full-scale implementation allows businesses to identify operational and regulatory challenges in a controlled environment, reducing the risk of costly issues after complete integration.
What trends are expected to shape this market in the coming years?
The development of corporate payment solutions based on regulated blockchain infrastructure—potentially including DREX itself as a settlement layer—is expected to expand the options available to companies seeking greater efficiency in their value transfer processes over the coming years. Paulo de Matos Junior believes that companies building the necessary knowledge and compliance framework today to operate with cryptoassets in their payment processes will be better positioned to capitalize on additional opportunities as the regulatory and technological ecosystem continues to evolve.
Competition among different digital payment methods—including already established instant payment systems such as Pix in the domestic market and central bank digital currency (CBDC) initiatives internationally—is expected to gradually shape the role of cryptoassets in corporate payments. The competitive advantage of cryptoassets is likely to be concentrated in specific use cases where conventional alternatives face significant limitations, such as certain international payment corridors or markets with limited banking access. Ultimately, a clear understanding of these high-value niches enables companies to make more informed decisions about where and how to incorporate cryptoassets into their payment management strategies.
